Individual Study
Needs a quiet seat with clear availability. Wants to book quickly without long searching. Uses the portal spontaneously between lectures.
"Many study spaces fill up quickly. Only with a clear real-time overview can students reliably plan their study sessions."
Needs a quiet seat with clear availability. Wants to book quickly without long searching. Uses the portal spontaneously between lectures.
Looks for suitable team areas for collaborative projects. Needs transparent time slots for all members. Usually plans bookings several days in advance.
Prefers specific learning environments such as computer workstations. Needs a clear room overview with filters. Expects reliable and accessible use.
The portal uses a clear structure with direct access to rooms, time slots, and actions. Students can orient themselves quickly and reach key functions without detours.
Search, selection, and confirmation are reduced to a few steps. Real-time availability supports quick decisions and helps prevent double bookings.
A focused room overview and simple status cues lower cognitive load. Students can compare options faster and choose a suitable seat with confidence.
The core idea of the booking portal was quickly understood. In particular, the simple reservation process performed well in tests. This created a low barrier to entering the flow.
Clear structure and fewer decisions per step made the biggest difference. Lower complexity directly improved usability. In future projects, I would prioritize this even earlier.
As a next step, I would test more real-world usage scenarios. Accessibility and long-term booking behavior especially need deeper validation. This would make the concept more robust over time.